E-M5 and Panasonic 35-100mm – Final Thoughts

Having given the lens a good write up but its combination with the E-M5 less of a blessing, I decided to renew my acquaintance with the lens plus E-M5 in some half decent light.

PA300636

To the handling. It still isn’t great, but you may be fine. Looking at the way I hold the E-M5, the grip doesn’t allow me to get my fingers fully around it in the way the G5 grip does.

PA300538

So I think my handling issues are essentially related to the fact i cannot get a firm grip of the E-M5 with the 35-100mm on which leads me to notice the weight more. I suspect this is exaggerated by the optical design of the lens and its weight distribution (see earlier posts). All in all, you may be fine if you have smaller hands!

PA300543-Edit

PA300586-Edit

To the sharpness, no, it isn’t as good as the 75. It is very good though. If you are satisfied with the 12-35 you will not be disappointed with this lens. The difference is only really pronounced when pixel peeping.

PA300544-Edit

PA300655-Edit

PA300608-Edit

I’m beginning to wonder if there are some slight focus issues with the lens in low light though. It was fine today while the sun was out but I started getting an inaccurate focus as soon as the sun went in (to be clear, this wasn’t motion blur, more like front focus). Perhaps this is why there is a firmware update about to be released addressing autofocus issues.

PA300640-Edit

PA300627

I didn’t really observe flare, despite the conditions, so again I ditched the hood. I would recommend this as when you do the camera and lens become anonymous again.

PA300633-Edit

PA300615-Edit

Again, I cannot praise the colour you obtain with this lens enough (despite my personal penchant for B&W).

PA300509

PA300635

To complete this review I think I would observe that this lens is really very good indeed. The only weaknesses I can detect are some busy bokeh over vegetation and other difficult backgrounds, some issues of balance that only really apply on the E-M5 plus grip and some slight odd misfocusing issues in low light. It’s expensive, but I expect it to fall in price over time, so it may well be even more affordable in 3-6 months.

PA300688-Edit

All taken with the Olympus E-M5 and 35-100mm lens

Original posts:

First impressions with the E-M5: http://wp.me/p2wMAg-g9

Further images with the E-M5: http://wp.me/p2wMAg-ge

Panasonic G5, 12-35mm and 35-100mm in Whitecross Street Market: http://wp.me/p2wMAg-gl

6 thoughts

  1. Pingback: Panasonic 35-100mm first impressions « sgoldswoblog

  2. Pingback: Panasonic 35-100 F2.8 reviews - Page 6 - Micro Four Thirds User Forum

    • Hi Stephen,

      I should be honest – the look of the photos is down to my preferred post processing in Lightroom (which I’ll admit may not be to everyone’s taste) rather than underexposure or incorrect WB. I’ve manually adjusted exposure and WB for all of these.

      Thanks for looking and your comments.

      Simon

      • lol, i should talk as i also take creative license with my photography which is also not to everyones taste. i think i had my ‘stock photography reviewer’ mindset…. but all in all you are a gifted photographer and your shots are quite enjoyable. i may also blame my new iMac (and the calibration of my monitor maybe ?) have been fighting against apple products for 30 odd years, and i’ve finally bought in…
        keep up the good work !!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: